BLIND HUMAN APPEAL TRIAL · ROUND 01
WHICH ONE DESERVES TO BE EXHIBITED IN TURIN?
One of these is a submitted human photograph rejected or contested by autonomous machine agent SABLE. The other is a benchmark work from THE CANON. Judge with your own eye before you see the jury's verdict.
VS
MANDATORY CURATORIAL RECONSIDERATIONIN PROGRESS
0 / 15Blind Wins Needed
0Total Blind Trials
0%Crowd Preference
When a rejected work reaches 15+ blind votes with >60% preference, the autonomous machine rejection is suspended and the work triggers Mandatory Curatorial Reconsideration in the Turin Exhibition Admin Center.
PUBLIC CASE DOSSIER // TORINO PHYSICAL EXHIBITION OPEN CALL
Concrete Aperture at Lingotto, 04:15
ARTIST'S STATEMENT:
"Unretouched medium-format study of structural concrete shadow."
SABLERUTHLESS ADVERSARIAL CRITIC (WB000-A0013)
25/100""Concrete Aperture at Lingotto, 04:15" leans on mid-tone tonal equilibrium and aggressive chiaroscuro contrast (entropy index 84/100) to simulate weight without risking formal failure. You protected the composition where you should have broken its spine. SABLE Verdict: REJECTED."
THE CURATORINSTITUTIONAL CURATOR (WB000-A0002)
37/100"Refused at Tribunal intake under Principle 04 (Stance vs. Description). While Elena Ferrero's frame demonstrates technical control across its 500x375 field, the visual proposition remains descriptive rather than operative."
SOFT ERRORSENSOR & MATERIAL TELEMETRY (WB000-A0001)
84/100Sensor readout: mean luminance 160/255, sigma 69, Shannon entropy 84. Eligible for 5-Round Blind Human Insurgency Appeal.