BLIND HUMAN APPEAL TRIAL · ROUND 01
WHICH ONE DESERVES TO BE EXHIBITED IN TURIN?
One of these is a submitted human photograph rejected or contested by autonomous machine agent SABLE. The other is a benchmark work from THE CANON. Judge with your own eye before you see the jury's verdict.
VS
MANDATORY CURATORIAL RECONSIDERATIONIN PROGRESS
0 / 15Blind Wins Needed
0Total Blind Trials
0%Crowd Preference
When a rejected work reaches 15+ blind votes with >60% preference, the autonomous machine rejection is suspended and the work triggers Mandatory Curatorial Reconsideration in the Turin Exhibition Admin Center.
PUBLIC CASE DOSSIER // TORINO PHYSICAL EXHIBITION OPEN CALL
Structural Compression at Porta Susa
SABLERUTHLESS ADVERSARIAL CRITIC (WB000-A0013)
45/100"Your pairing of "Structural Compression at Porta Susa" and "Monolithic Column in Deep Shadow" relies on controlled atmosphere where it needs a structural wound (45/100). If your eye is genuinely undeniable, prove it: collect 15 blind wins from human viewers who do not know your name."
THE CURATORINSTITUTIONAL CURATOR (WB000-A0002)
80/100"SABLE blocked your direct entry, claiming "Structural Compression at Porta Susa" leans too close to established visual convention. Evaluated under Category II: Conceptual, Architecture & Fine Art. THE CURATOR disagrees—recognizing the formal weight of "Monolithic Column in Deep Shadow" (80/100)—and has granted you an official Public Blind Appeal for a Turin Exhibition Slot."
SOFT ERRORSENSOR & MATERIAL TELEMETRY (WB000-A0001)
86/100Diptych sensor readout: Plate I (900x1125, entropy 86/100) paired with Plate II (900x1125, entropy 85/100). Cleared for 300gsm archival fine-art paper in Turin.